Three things I liked:
1. Bette Davis - watching her personality change from headstrong socialite to grateful patient to drunken brat and finally a content country wife.
2. The ridiculousness of another era - Driving a car against an obvious video backdrop. Everyone smoking everywhere. Attire for a doctor’s appointment: patient in a fur trimmed dress, doctor in a formal suit. “Tell me, doctor, on what part of my head will you operate?” “Now, now. That’s my worry.”
3. It was fun to see Ronald Reagan as Judith’s tipsy society friend.
Two things I disliked:
There really isn’t anything I dislike about this film. I appreciate it for what it is: A melodramatic story from another time.
What surprised me:
The expression of love between Judy and Ann - when they said “I love you” before Judy’s surgery, and their dramatic scene together in the garden.
Bette Davis or Vivien Leigh for the Oscar?
Vivien Leigh for sure. Vivien was Scarlett O’Hara and Bette Davis was still Bette Davis.
Rudy's Review - Dark Victory (1939)
As far as Bette Davis melodramas go, this one is good fun, but I am more partial to Now, Voyager.
Three things I liked:
1. Bette Davis (even though she is a consummate over-actor) is fascinating to watch.
2. I liked the supporting cast ( although I'm not sure I liked Bogart as the Irish horse trainer) and the great chemistry between George Brent and Bette Davis.
3. The costumes with the fur trim. To die for!!! I found a fun blog with most of the costumes:
The Blonde at the Film. The I've not yet done a Bette Davis paper doll, but it's on my list. Would love to draw some of those outfits!!
Two things I disliked:
1. So over-the-top melodramatic!!! But I guess that was the point. Cheesy death scene.
2. The white halter dress. Davis was too busty to pull it off. And the acorn beanies she wore to cover her surgery were silly looking.
One thing that surprised me.
Seeing Ronald Reagan on screen. Funny to see him in the movies knowing he would later be president. His hair was the same throughout his entire life!!!
Who should have won the Oscar?
I haven't seen any of the other films yet, except GWTW, but I imagine Vivien Leigh as Scarlett would be hard to top.
David's Review - Dark Victory (1939)
What I liked:
1. Bette Davis! A “woman’s picture” that allowed (and encouraged) Bette’s larger-than-life emotional tsunami. Whereas sometimes she seemed to be over-acting in many of her roles, this movie had such mellow dramatic highs determined by medical and romantic circumstances that anybody would be forgiven for reacting (or over-reacting) as the sorrowful story unfolds. I hate to be shallow, but I must confess that Bette’s wardrobe impressed me… her lavish furs and bejeweled t-shirt top, but not the beanie hat that looked like an acorn top.
What I disliked:
Geraldine Fitzgerald’s superlative performance was spoiled by her mis-matched false eyelashes (her left-eye lashes were too long and reached her brow, distracting in close-ups. OK, so I’m being shallow again).
What surprised me:
Humphrey Bogart cast as a randy horse trainer with a lust-crush on Bette. Ronald Reagan as a society playboy who also was smitten by Bette. Unlikely POTUS, but who can second-guess politics?
The Oscar?
I think Bette’s sensitive, but over-the-top portrayal of doomed Judith gave Vivien Leigh a run for her money. The source material mattered. GWTW was a sprawling epic while Dark Victory was a tear-jerking novella.
Sally's Review - Dark Victory (1939)
What I liked:
I have seen this film many times, and always enjoyed it. It is a Bette Davis movie, and I would watch it as just that. This time I looked at it with a critical eye and realized her performance while usually over the top, made this a melodramatic performance, while it could have been a truly touching and moving one. When she finally trudges up the stairs I was not shedding a single tear, not because I am cold hearted, but I just didn't really care. Is that what she wanted to convey? I think not. I felt more empathy for her supporting cast. Geraldine Fitzgerald and George Brent play their parts with sympathy and make you truly feel the gravity of the situation. Humphrey Bogart gives an exceptional non-ganster performance that is so beautifully underplayed.
What I disliked:
What was disturbing was the way cigarettes were used. I realized only the women were smoking in almost every scene, not the men, not even Humphrey! Geraldine Fitzgerald is holding and smoking even though she must not have smoked in real life as she looks oddly awkward. Bette of course uses them as part of her image. I think the tobacco industry may have helped finance this film, and truly wanted to convince the American woman that smoking was glamorous and acceptable in the best homes. When Bette tells the doctors to help themselves to cigarettes in the other room, I realized it was a very brainwashing suggestion.
The Oscar?
I do not think Bette deserved an award for this role.
 |
LOVE AFFAIR (1939)
Irene Dunne nominated for Best Actress as Terry McKay
Co-Starring: Charles Boyer as Michel Marnet,
Maria Ouspenskaya as Grandmother Janou.
Directed by Leo McCarey.
A shipboard romance ends with a plan to meet six months later at the top of the Empire State Building.
Irene Dunne Paper Doll from Classic Drama Queens (Paper Studio Press, 2016) by David Wolfe. |
Jenny's Review - Love Affair (1939)
Three things I liked:
1. This is a simple, sweet story. Watching this film is a gentle sedative to overproduced movies of today. The love affair between Terry and Michel is primarily nonverbal. We know exactly how they feel about each other through their eyes.
2. I enjoyed “getting to know” Irene Dunne. Although I’ve watched a few of her films, including I Remember Mama (1948) and The Awful Truth (1937), she didn’t stick in my memory like other actresses of her era such as Lana Turner and Bette Davis.
3. Maria Ouspenskaya is terrific as Michel’s grandmother.
What I disliked:
There’s nothing to dislike!
What surprised me:
I’m surprised that I prefer this version over the 1957 remake, An Affair to Remember, in which I found Cary Grant to be a little too Cary Grant.
Who should have won the Best Actress Oscar?
No one had a chance against Vivien Leigh.
Rudy's Review - Love Affair (1939)
Three things I liked:
1. I have not seen a lot of films with Charles Boyer or Irene Dunne. I loved them both in this.
2. The scene where they kiss behind the door is stunning. I believe it's the only kiss in the whole film. After the kiss, he leaves and she is standing alone wearing a drop-dead backless halter gown and the camera freezes on her looking off into the distance. It's really gorgeous.
3. I love the repartee between Michel and Terry.
Two things I disliked:
1. That scene where she sings in the nightclub. Ugh! That singing style makes me cringe.
2. I've always had a hard time with Terry's decision not to tell Michel about her accident. It makes no sense to me. But, obviously we need it to be that way to make his discovery at the end so moving.
One thing that surprised me:
I adore An Affair to Remember with Deborah Kerr and Cary Grant. It's been a favorite since I first saw it as a teenager on the late show. I'd never seen the original until now, and I found it just as charming. So romantic!
Who should have won the Oscar?
Still going with Vivien Leigh.
David's Review - Love Affair (1939)
What I liked:
As always, I liked Irene Dunne and was able to put up with Charles Boyer, but found them to be an unlikely couple, thereby making me unable to suspend disbelief. Irene gave her usual sprightly performance and Monsieur relied upon his smarmy French accent that apparently made the ladies swoon in 1939. I didn’t dislike the movie, but I will never watch it again and I am likely to repair my memory by re-watching Cary and Deborah fall in love and bring me to tears for the all-time great romantic ending.
What I disliked:
I was looking forward to seeing Love Affair once again, having seen it many, many years ago. I remembered it as being elegant, glamorous and super-sophisticated. My recollection is evidently faulty and I was very disappointed. I think I must have scrambled my memory and confused it with the '50s remake retitled An Affair to Remember. That remake, starring Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr, was indeed elegant, glamorous and super sophisticated. The 1939 version was obviously a low budget, rather maudlin, corny soap opera romance from cheapie RKO Radio Pictures.
What surprised me:
I was surprised (and delighted) that I HAD remembered an over-the-top, oversize, monster of a fur jacket that looked like it could be yeti fur.
I was surprised by the archaic cinematography, the pedantic, plodding script and the faked rear-projection scenery. How could this old-fashioned effort be made the same year as the brilliant screenplay, visual artistry and performances in Gone With the Wind?
Who should have won the Oscar?
It’s a big surprise to me that Irene Dunne was even nominated for this film. She delivered an adequate performance, but is the least likely to have won against Bette Davis, Greta Garbo, Greer Garson and especially Vivien Leigh’s pitch perfect portrayal of Scarlett O’Hara.
Sally's Review - Love Affair (1939)
This film is so bewildering on many levels. While the story is a good story, as it proved in two remakes, this version is really dreadful. It seems that Irene was not told that this was not a comedy. She is smug and delivers a performance that doesn't fit the story at all. Then there are the tedious musical numbers that are too long and uninspired. Perhaps the most bewildering aspect is that she should be nominated for an Academy Award for this performance. The musical score is dreadful and sounds as if it should be cartoon background music.
Somehow the director has made a movie that should have been released no later than 1930, it is so visually "old fashioned." However, the performance that Charles Boyer gives is touching and solid. He is a likable cad in the beginning of the movie and although the plot is heavy handed at times, he is believable. When he confronts Terry about her absence and is sarcastic (while Irene acts coy and silly) his hurt and anger seem genuine, and finally when he realizes the truth he is touching without being too sentimental.
I would not recommend this film to anyone who is not a true movie buff.
 |
NINOTCHKA (1939)
Greta Garbo nominated for Best Actress as Ninotchka
Co-Starring:
Melvyn Douglas as Count Leon d’Algout
Ina Claire as Grand Duchess Swana
Directed by Earnst Lubitsch.
A Russian diplomat goes to Paris to assist in the sale of confiscated jewels and discovers love along the way.
Greta Garbo Paper Doll (Paper Studio Press, 2009) by Norma Lu Meehan. |
Jenny's Review - Ninotchka (1939)
What I liked:
There are a lot of witty lines in this film. (Billy Wilder was one of the screen writers):
1. Grand Duchess Swana at her dressing table, chatting incessantly to Leon: “It’s really a wretched morning… wretched. I can’t get myself right. I wanted to look mellow and I look brittle. My face doesn’t compose well. It’s all highlights… How can I dim myself down, Leon? Suggest something. I am so bored with this face. I wish I had someone else's face. Whose face would you have if you had your choice? Oh, well, I guess one gets the face one deserves.”
2. Ninotchka noticing a strange, cone-shaped hat in a Parisian shop window: “Tsk, tsk, tsk, how can such a civilization survive which permits women to put things like that on their heads.”
3. Waiter: “Now what shall it be?” Ninotchka: “Raw beets and carrots.” Waiter: “Madame, this is a restaurant, not a meadow.”
Two things I didn't like:
1. Leon’s wooing is rather disgusting: “Look at the clock. One hand has met the other hand, they kiss… Why do doves bill and coo? Why do snails, coldest of all creatures, circle interminably around each other? Why do flowers slowly open their petals.” Gross, but hey, it was eighty years ago.
2. The mock firing squad conducted by the two lovers. Yikes.
What surprised me:
I was expecting to see cinema’s most beautiful woman step onto the screen, but instead was introduced to a severe Russian agent in drab dress, barking out orders in a dull, measured cadence. But the writing is on the wall—or script as the case may be. Garbo falls under the spell of love and transforms from drab diplomat to chic sophisticate, topped off with the high fashion hat she previously poo-pooed in the shop window. Her hair style is hilarious. Most of it is quite normal—simple, straight, curled under at the chin, but things take a turn at her forehead with crazy, curly curtain-like bangs. In other words: it’s a party in the front, business in the back.
Before watching I only knew two things about his movie: the title and Garbo’s Best Actress nomination. Expecting a serious drama, I was delighted to find myself watching a comedy, a political satire to be precise. Although the story is light and silly, it is shadowed by the brutalities of Russia’s dictatorship. Released at the time war was breaking out in Europe, I wonder how audiences responded. Perhaps, like Garbo, they just had a good laugh.
Who should have won the Oscar?
Vivien Leigh for sure. Although Garbo was terrific as Ninotchka, her acting is more on the surface, whereas Vivien acts from the inside out. Perhaps Garbo displays more acting chops in her other roles.
Rudy's Review - Ninotchka (1939)
Overall, I liked and enjoyed the film, but I wasn't totally won over. Actually, I fell asleep twice and had to go back and rewatch parts of it.
Three things I liked:
1. I loved the three Russian sidekicks who eventually became Ninotchka's friends. (That counts as three things, doesn't it?)
What I disliked:
1. It was interesting watching Garbo. I've not seen many of her movies and I enjoyed studying her. She's got a brain. That being said, I must confess, I've never quite gotten the whole Garbo fascination. I still don't. There's nothing soft about her, even when her character lightens up later in the film.
2. I wasn't crazy about Melvin Douglas. He played his part well, but I don't find him that attractive.
What surprised me:
I was surprised at how political it was. And very smart.
Who should have won the Oscar? Vivien Leigh gets my vote so far.
David's Review - Ninotchka (1939)
Three things I liked:
1. I was captivated by the simple romantic tale that was as intoxicating as the champagne which played an important role in liberating Ninotchka.
I loved the film’s determination to have faith in romance even as civilization was about to suffer a cataclysmic war.
2. Garbo’s carefully nuanced performance was sensitive and believably comic.
I so enjoyed the supporting cast of characters—the three comic comrades, the wise butler, the calculating Grand Duchess—all superb.
3. I felt the aura of sophistication propelled the story arc beautifully. And Garbo is always incandescent, in my eyes.
What I disliked:
That hat! It should have been giddy but instead it looked like a hollow sweet potato.
The Oscar?
I believe the Oscar rightly went to Vivien Leigh. “Garbo laughs!” was the famous tagline used to promote the film and it was fun to see her so gleeful but not worthy of the prize (which should have been hers often in the past).
Sally's Review - Ninotchka (1939)
What I liked:
1. This film is a delightful experience. Garbo is exactly perfect as Ninotchka, and made a fan out of me. I have always found her "silent movie acting" somewhat embarrassing. It often was passable because of her roles, but in Ninotchka she has great comic appeal and a softness she never exhibited before.
2. Melvyn Douglas is wonderful as a besotted playboy fascinated with this odd creature, and of course her three comrades make the film a delight.
What I disliked:
The only fault is the wardrobe. Surely they could have designed better clothes for her.
The Oscar?
Comic performances seldom, if ever, get Academy Awards, and the fact that Garbo was in the running with Vivien Leigh makes it obvious that Ms. Leigh should win.
 |
GOODBYE MR CHIPS (1939)
Greer Garson nominated for Best Actress as Katherine
Co-starring Robert Donat as Mr. Chips
The love of a wonderful woman brings out the best in a shy school teacher.
Directed by Sam Wood.
Greer Garson 1944 Reproduction Paper Doll (2007 Paper Studio Press) |
Jenny's Review - Goodbye Mr. Chips (1939)
Three things I liked:
1. Along with the characters in the film I instantly fell under the spell of Greer’s performance. I was truly enchanted by her fairy-godmother-like persona.
2. I liked watching the decades-long growth of Mr. Chips’ character, going from meek school teacher to happy husband to respected headmaster.
3. I enjoyed observing the Victorian era—how people interacted with each other and the language used. Then, an orgy was a tea party!
Two things I disliked:
1. At the beginning of the film, Robert Donat’s exaggerated portrayal of elderly Mr. Chips was so contrived, reminding me of Dick Van Dyke as the old banker in Mary Poppins. However, watching Mr. Chips’ progression through a series of flashbacks, I became more accepting of Donat’s performance.
2. Yawn! The gentle story put me right to sleep. I needed popcorn and three viewing installments to get through the movie.
One thing that surprised me:
I was not expecting such impertinent behavior from school boys of the 1800s. Apparently, if they can get away with it, kids will be bad whether it’s 1879 or 2019.
Who should have won the Best Actress Oscar?
Although her appearance in the film was short, I found more depth in Greer’s performance than some of the other nominees, but still no match for Vivien Leigh.
Side note:
On David’s recommendation I watched MGM’s 1969 musical remake starring Peter O’Toole and Petula Clark. Unlike David who adores this movie, I did not care for it. Mr. Chips and Katherine were given more dynamic storylines, but the “thought sequence” songs were cringeworthy, sung very slowly with little melody.
Rudy's Review - Goodbye Mr. Chips (1939)
What I liked:
1. What a sweet movie!! I had not seen it before.
2. I loved the characters. They were all so kind-hearted.
3. Greer Garson is so warm and beautiful.
4. I thought the way they aged Robert Donat was very successful.
What I disliked:
Greer Garson's role was too brief. I was devastated when she and the baby died. So sad.
What surprised me:
I had never even heard of Robert Donat before and I was surprised to read that he won an Academy Award for this movie. Not that he didn't deserve it, but I'm just mystified that I had never heard of him.
Who should have won the Oscar? Vivien Leigh
David's Review - Goodbye Mr. Chips (1939)
What I liked?
There is very little to like about this oddly bland and boring movie that (belatedly) launched Greer Garson’s impressive career. She had been “discovered” on the London stage by Louis B. Mayer who was on a talent-scouting trip in Europe. Greer was already in her 30s, too mature for the usual “starlet” treatment. After a long wait in Hollywood, Greer landed the ridiculously brief role of Mrs. Chips, a sweet little vignette that brings a bit of life to the otherwise plodding film.
Greer’s charm is evident even though her sweetheart make-up and curly coiffure leaves her looking like a Busby Berkeley doll-like chorus girl. It seems likely to me that the studio may have orchestrated Greer’s nomination for this insignificant role, the first step up to well-deserved regal stardom with box office clout. Soon she was cast as Mrs. Miniver, winning the Oscar and looking like the beauteous Queen of MGM for the following decade.
What I disliked:
Robert Donat. His portrayal had two notes. As a young professor he was charmless, unpopular and effete until he meets Greer and instantly falls in love. As an elderly Head Master he switches to a somewhat comic performance, looking a bit daffy, beloved by his pupils.
Surprises?
The plot is so expected that I was never surprised.
Oscar for Greer’s screen debut?
Not for this thankless role that should not have been nominated. Vivien’s Oscar deserves her well-deserved award.
Suggestion: I recommend the brilliant, heartfelt musical version made in the '60s and starring Peter O’Toole as a lovable, loving Mr. Chips who falls for Petula Clark, an adorable soubrette.
Sally's Review - Goodbye Mr. Chips (1939)
What I liked:
If I am only reviewing the Greer Garson aspect of this movie, I would give it thumbs up without any hesitation. The moment she appears, like a beacon in a foggy sea of a mediocre script and performances, the film is so enjoyable, She always has a wonderful presence, but there is an earthy quality to her in this role.
The fact that the film is nostalgic about World War l seems quaint, knowing that in 1939 World War II was looming around the corner makes those of us from the future feel sorry for the poor souls living their safe lives in Britain.
What I disliked:
The only thing I don't like is the script. I never read the book, but may just do that to see if there is some explanation for Chips' reclusiveness. Also I am not a fan of Donat in any role, so that, too, detracts from my liking the film.
The Oscar?
There is too little of Greer Garson, who truly lit up the screen. Her tiny role hardly seems to deserve a Best Actress award.
